Why are guns only for killing people? I own lots of guns and have never killed anyone.  We use guns for hunting here. The only way you'd get killed by me is if you dressed up as a deer.  I do have pistols that /could/ be used for hunting but I use mine to make my dick larger.

There should only be laws against things that harm other people.

You don't need to carry a gun then. Unless you think you're going bump into an angry deer on your trip to the shops?

Like owning guns?

I am not, and yet somehow I've managed not to go on a shooting rampage against gay people! I know, pretty crazy but somehow I do it!

My view is that it's not right, BUT if they want to do it and it doesn't harm me then go for it. What do I care? My complaint is against them getting the same benefits as a traditional marriage. 

Why shouldn't they? Are they not two normal people who love each other and want to be public and open about their relationship and have the legal safeguards that come with marriage like any other people do?

I'll lay a gun on my desk, and when it jumps up and kills someone I'll send you 1 BILLION dollars, deal?

Hunting rifles are designed for hunting. Target pistols and rifles are designed for target shooting. Most guns owned in the US, and certainly the ones we're bothered about here, are neither of those.

The guns we're concerned with are handguns, which are shit for hunting (with the exception of a few very high calibre revolvers and stuff); SMP/SMGs, which certainly have no non-combat purpose and assault rifles where... well, the clue is in the name.

These are all designed specifically for harming people. That is what they are for, that is the guiding principle when designing them.

Most guns here are rifles and shotguns. I'd say by at least a 10:1 margin. The explosion in the past year with pistols has been driven by the talk of banning them.

You can't actually mean those things and be against gay marriage, you realise that, right?

So which is the lie?

Hunting rifles and shotguns (hunting shotguns, not combat shotguns) are fine. We have those here, too. I don't think anyone here is particularly bothered about those.

We're talking about the handguns, SMP/SMGs and assault rifles.

All of your guns are handguns, aren't they?

That's just my opinion on it. I think marriage should be between a man and a woman. The whole purpose, IMO, of a marriage is to have and raise children.

I'm not "against" gay marriage, I just don't think it's right. Right as in a natural thing. 

Literally no credibility.

Witness dismissed. Case closed.

Guns are now illegal and gay marriage is mandatory.

Are blowjobs, BDSM and vibrators natural? Should they be illegal too? Are cars natural? How about hats?

I have 3 handguns and about 10 rifles and shotguns.

What right should gay couples have?

Is there any form of legal recognition for gay couples in the US?

What are you talking about?

I don't see anything wrong with blowjobs, or any sexual activity if you are both in agreement.

I don't follow you on the other examples.  A car was made to drive, try to sail across the ocean in one and it doesn't quite work. Hats are just badass and can be worn whenever you feel like it, especially if you have a gun.

There are some states that have made marriage legal, other than that they have the same rights as any other unmarried person.