Opinion help me do
From: milko 6 Sep 2012 15:53
To: Monsoir (PILOTDAN)
38 of 93
This one?
0/0
From: Monsoir (PILOTDAN) 6 Sep 2012 15:57
To: milko
39 of 93
It's like you were in my head.
0/0
From: koswix 6 Sep 2012 16:19
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
40 of 93
Jesus' Love Syndrome.
EDITED: 6 Sep 2012 16:20 by KOSWIX
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 6 Sep 2012 17:32
To: Matt
42 of 93
Yeah, poor Fudge. :(
0/0
From: MrTrent 6 Sep 2012 17:34
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
43 of 93
Fuck him. Here in Yorkshire we find hamsters to be flea ridden and inconsequential. Apparently.
0/0
From: Manthorp 6 Sep 2012 18:42
To: MrTrent
44 of 93
But sexy.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 Sep 2012 20:06
To: graphitone
45 of 93
quote:
As well as rides on the open trams, there is a small souvenir shop at the top selling sweets plus a replica Edwardian shop at the bottom displaying nostalgia.
:')
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 Sep 2012 20:15
To: Manthorp
46 of 93
Only if you bind them with gaffer tape. Otherwise they split open. Or so I'm told.
0/0
From: Manthorp 6 Sep 2012 20:28
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
47 of 93
It's OK if you have a tiny penis. Or so I'm told.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 6 Sep 2012 20:36
To: Manthorp
48 of 93
:((
0/0
From: graphitone 6 Sep 2012 20:56
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
49 of 93
(nod)
It's a marvel. You should come on over to check out its quarter mile ride of joy. There's very little dog poo, honest.
0/0
Message 39883.50 was deleted
From: Woggy 7 Sep 2012 05:42
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
51 of 93
Cuckoo cuckoo! :-((
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 7 Sep 2012 05:52
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
52 of 93
No one's asking you why you don't respond to expletive laden rants since there haven't been any (not directed at you, at least).
The question was more: Why don't you respond to reasonable questions and rquests for more information.
I don't suppose you're going to answer the actual question though, you never do, you'd rather play the victim. Which is pretty fucking deplorable since everyone here has been phenomenally polite, patient and reasonable.
Your anti-Semitism is noxious.
The question was more: Why don't you respond to reasonable questions and rquests for more information.
I don't suppose you're going to answer the actual question though, you never do, you'd rather play the victim. Which is pretty fucking deplorable since everyone here has been phenomenally polite, patient and reasonable.
Your anti-Semitism is noxious.
0/0
From: Woggy 7 Sep 2012 06:03
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
53 of 93
You're just being mean, it's not his fault he's a bit simple :-P
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 7 Sep 2012 06:17
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
54 of 93
quote: 53.12North (53NORTH)
The reason why I don't reply to expletive laden rants should be obvious.
I can recall (but can't be arsed to search) very simple, polite, expletive-free requests, notably from Ant and Patch, for you to substantiate or clarify your predictions. You have singularly failed to do so. Instead you respond with yet more pseudo-intellectual, cryptic gibberish.
If you wish to be taken seriously, you have to start acting like you're serious, and that means responding to direct questions with direct answers.
Otherwise, you're just a fool.
EDITED: 7 Sep 2012 06:18 by MR_BASTARD
0/0
From: JonCooper 7 Sep 2012 07:53
To: ALL55 of 93
this guy is annoying me far more than Trig ever did
0/0
From: Monsoir (PILOTDAN) 7 Sep 2012 10:11
To: JonCooper
56 of 93
Ditto, I don't know why but it really gets to me
0/0