1–10…221–230231–240241–250251–260…391–392

Alan's Psychadelic Earthquake Breakfast

From: graphitone29 Aug 2012 08:22
To: Manthorp 241 of 392
39777.241 In reply to 39777.239

:-O

 

:-S

 

:-O~~~

Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2012 09:48
To: Manthorp 242 of 392
39777.242 In reply to 39777.238
Of cour'se, 'silly me.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2012 09:49
To: graphitone 243 of 392
39777.243 In reply to 39777.240
My avatar is modelled on them, albeit much reduced in size. Honest!
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone29 Aug 2012 09:53
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 244 of 392
39777.244 In reply to 39777.243
quote:
My avatar is modelled on them

I hope you don't mean the rabbit.
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2012 10:00
To: graphitone 245 of 392
39777.245 In reply to 39777.244
No, that would be most 'unfortunate'...
Attachments:
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone29 Aug 2012 10:12
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 246 of 392
39777.246 In reply to 39777.245

:-D

 

If it was shaped like a rabbit, you could claim a patent victory over those Ann Summers people.

Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2012 10:14
To: graphitone 247 of 392
39777.247 In reply to 39777.246

That's about the only thing I would be able to claim.

 

Fortunately, I just use it like a rabbit (bunny)

Reply
0/0
From: graphitone29 Aug 2012 10:20
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 248 of 392
39777.248 In reply to 39777.247

You're slowly turning into teh Manthrob.

 

You'll be claiming Moorlock for your own next.*

 

 

 


*(Or was he shared around? This Moorlock baiting was before my time here)

Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)29 Aug 2012 10:43
To: graphitone 249 of 392
39777.249 In reply to 39777.248
Greg was friends with both Throb and Simon Roberts. He wasn't known as a slack-arse only for spending so much time as a bloody student y'know. Hence my delight at finding tightening cream for him.
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone29 Aug 2012 11:13
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 250 of 392
39777.250 In reply to 39777.249
(giggle)
Reply
0/0
Message 39777.251 was deleted
From: Manthorp30 Aug 2012 20:06
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 252 of 392
39777.252 In reply to 39777.251
quote:
This makes their little Island of Democracy up shjt street techtonically. They might aswell alihn themselves with Lincoln, Kennedy(s) and Lennon..


= flibble, flibble, flibble...
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)30 Aug 2012 20:30
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 253 of 392
39777.253 In reply to 39777.251
(they're up shit creek already, just don't rub it in eh?)
Reply
0/0
Message 39777.254 was deleted
Message 39777.255 was deleted
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 4 Sep 2012 07:28
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 256 of 392
39777.256 In reply to 39777.255
Took some time to squeeze out

Which reminds me of a recent story. Emily was trying to go to the toilet...

Emily: "Mummy, my poo's square"
Fiona: "What do you mean, it's square?"
Emily: "It won't come out of my bottom"
Fiona: "You just have to push harder"
Emily: "It's alright for you mummy, I've only got a little bottom!"

:')
Reply
0/0
Message 39777.257 was deleted
From: graphitone 4 Sep 2012 12:15
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 258 of 392
39777.258 In reply to 39777.257
Seriously dude... no. NO.
Reply
0/0
Message 39777.259 was deleted
From: graphitone 5 Sep 2012 11:20
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 260 of 392
39777.260 In reply to 39777.259

They're right there, back in the 60s.

 

I'm pretty sure people were taught shame in the 60s, except maybe the hippies. And if people weren't guilty of stuff, why did prisons exist in that decade? Or were they planning for the 70s?

Reply
0/0