Alan's Psychadelic Earthquake Breakfast
Message 39777.130 was deleted
From: koswix 9 Aug 2012 22:01
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
131 of 392
?
0/0
From: koswix 9 Aug 2012 22:31
To: JonCooper
133 of 392
That's not Manthorp, his stamen is much bigger. And prettier.
0/0
From: Manthorp 9 Aug 2012 23:21
To: koswix
134 of 392
Why thank you, big boy. Now this:
is my kind of bloom. Edunia, the artfag flower.
is my kind of bloom. Edunia, the artfag flower.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)10 Aug 2012 08:17
To: koswix
136 of 392
(snigger)
0/0
From: graphitone10 Aug 2012 08:37
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
137 of 392
Child.
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)10 Aug 2012 09:40
To: graphitone
138 of 392
Guilty as charged :(
0/0
From: graphitone10 Aug 2012 12:50
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
139 of 392
:-D
Tis the way of things in the natural world - everything's fucking everything else all day in all the amazing ways that nature's evolved, and as everything's still evolving it would seem that that particular little plant has taken a bold step and emulated (down to the last detail) Manthorp's cock.
0/0
From: Manthorp10 Aug 2012 13:09
To: graphitone
140 of 392
Granted it's got the colour and the surface texture right, but in the absence of a meter rule I am guessing that it's built to 1:12th scale.
0/0
From: graphitone10 Aug 2012 13:27
To: Manthorp
141 of 392
(giggle)
0/0
From: patch10 Aug 2012 13:44
To: Manthorp
142 of 392
Scaled which way?
0/0
Message 39777.143 was deleted
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)10 Aug 2012 21:14
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
144 of 392
If the beam is invisible, how do you know it's there?
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 Aug 2012 21:18
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
145 of 392
Wind, heat, and smell?
0/0
Message 39777.146 was deleted
From: Manthorp11 Aug 2012 11:59
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
147 of 392
Splendid.
0/0
Message 39777.148 was deleted