Media server me do

From: johngti_mk-ii30 Aug 2011 10:08
To: ANT_THOMAS 14 of 31
Thanks for the tip - starting to think some sort of NAS might be better...windows home server 2011 needs a better machine than I have and according to what I've been able.to find so far points to earlier versions not liking windows 7 too much. I'll have to get off the phone and start having a look on a proper computer
From: Matt30 Aug 2011 11:32
To: johngti_mk-ii 15 of 31
How about a HP N36L?

It's £242 on Ebuyer, but you can claim £100 rebate from HP. Comes with 1 250GB HDD, but has space to hold 4 HDDs and a optical drive. It's x86 capable too so will run Windows (Home) Server or some Linux or whatever you fancy throwing at it.
From: ANT_THOMAS30 Aug 2011 12:31
To: johngti_mk-ii 16 of 31

What Matt said.

 

If I didn't already have more than the amount of drives to put in one of those I'd buy one myself.

From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)30 Aug 2011 14:16
To: johngti_mk-ii 17 of 31
What Matt said, thirded.. I've had one for about 7 months now I think, loaded with a couple of 2TB drives and the standard one for the OS, with WHS2011 and DriveBender ('cos MS decided to remove the duplication feature); add Mezzmo or a free alternative as a DLNA server, and you've got a great thingy in a little box.
From: Richy (GAJIT)30 Aug 2011 22:54
To: Matt 18 of 31
That is exactly what I run my WHS2011 on :)
From: Richy (GAJIT)30 Aug 2011 22:57
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 19 of 31
quote: Serg (NUKKLEAR)
... or a free alternative as a DLNA server ...

Such as Serviio

From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)31 Aug 2011 08:29
To: Richy (GAJIT) 20 of 31
Precisely - although I had some issues with Serviio, so I'm sticking to Mezzmo for now.
I'm also following this thread to set up SABnzbd and Sick Beard (but without XBMC 'cos my TV can stream DLNA so I don't need it). Geekness!
From: ANT_THOMAS31 Aug 2011 09:10
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 21 of 31
I assume you pay for Usenet access?
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)31 Aug 2011 10:02
To: ANT_THOMAS 22 of 31
Well you have to, no?
From: ANT_THOMAS31 Aug 2011 10:18
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 23 of 31
It's just my confusion about people paying to pirate, each to their own I guess.
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)31 Aug 2011 10:40
To: ANT_THOMAS 24 of 31

I would quite happily pay a monthly fee to someone if that would mean being able to legally stream/download movies in high quality and I was provided with a good choice of material - I do so already for Spotify (despite its niggles).

 

But there isn't yet such a service for video material unfortunately. Retarded industry...

From: ANT_THOMAS31 Aug 2011 10:49
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 25 of 31
So would I (maybe) but I refuse to pay to pirate.
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)31 Aug 2011 17:33
To: ANT_THOMAS 26 of 31
My ISP gives me free Usenet access. It's the only reason I put up with their shitty speeds.
From: patch31 Aug 2011 17:35
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 27 of 31
I think most ISPs do (BT certainly does) but you only get a certain number of connections, and the servers you connect to may not hold on to files for as long as pay-to-access ones do.
From: ANT_THOMAS31 Aug 2011 17:35
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 28 of 31
Pretty sure over here that stopped long ago!
From: ANT_THOMAS31 Aug 2011 17:38
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 29 of 31
Or I could be wrong!
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)31 Aug 2011 17:42
To: patch 30 of 31
Yeah same deal. I get less that 100 days of retention and 5 connections. But it's unlimited.
From: patch31 Aug 2011 18:00
To: ANT_THOMAS 31 of 31
I vaguely remember reading something about providing access to Usenet as being one of the requirements of being an ISP. Though I could be mis-remembering things.