SatNav reviews

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 May 2011 17:00
To: milko 59 of 80
Nope, although I was thinking more of a windscreen HUD thing.


Do you think self-driving cars will actually become a reality?

I think I'd expect too many people opposed to them, so unless the government forced a law through, I'm not sure how likely it is.


...hmm, is this dragging Caer's thread completely off topic, or has he found something he's happy with now? :S
From: ANT_THOMAS10 May 2011 17:05
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 60 of 80

But surely there would've been multiple signs showing the split for a short distance before hand.

 

Either way, yes using both properly is definitely better than one or the other. I tend to know/expect what the sat nav is going to say before it happens anyway based on earlier signs. Though knowing how many miles till the junction you need is nice since it stops me junction counting.

From: af (CAER)10 May 2011 17:18
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 61 of 80
No no, I have gleaned what I wished to know, and have vented cathartically, and this new thread direction is most interesting.

And yes, I do think self-driving cars will become a reality, but the biggest obstacles will be political and social, not technological. There was an interesting series of articles on Ars Technica about this not so long ago.
From: JonCooper10 May 2011 17:25
To: af (CAER) 62 of 80
I would be sad to have to ride in self-driving cars and would resist such a change
From: af (CAER)10 May 2011 17:31
To: JonCooper 63 of 80
Why?
From: ANT_THOMAS10 May 2011 17:46
To: af (CAER) 64 of 80
Well I know I certainly enjoy driving.
From: JonCooper10 May 2011 17:49
To: af (CAER) 65 of 80
same, I enjoy driving and would want to do it myself
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 May 2011 17:57
To: ANT_THOMAS 66 of 80
There may well have been multiple signs, but if so I missed them all.

What I actually saw was the sign saying "haha, you went the wrong way and it's too late now!"
From: ANT_THOMAS10 May 2011 18:03
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 67 of 80
Not too late there at all :$
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 May 2011 18:15
To: ANT_THOMAS 68 of 80
The thought did go through my mind, but there was assorted crap covering the stripes, and a car in that lane, so it was too risky.

Was going to say it turned out not to be too far until I could stop and turn around, but seems it was over 8 miles. Heh.
From: milko10 May 2011 22:03
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 69 of 80
I think self-driving cars are an inevitability but won't be with us for a long time. Mainly because the vast majority don't want them, but once fuel shortages really bite I suspect there will be a bit more pressure on it. You'll certainly soon struggle to buy a car that doesn't change gear for you if you don't change soon enough (bit like Smart cars do, or at least ones I've been in), more conservative rev limiting, and various other measures that take some control away. You've already got auto-parking and auto-braking becoming more widespread. It'll be little by little.

I reckon there'll still be scope for off-roading and things like that manually. And I dunno if this will happen in my lifetime necessarily.
From: af (CAER)11 May 2011 09:19
To: milko 70 of 80
You say "vast majority don't want them" - is this actually the case? I really would like to see a proper survey done on this.

And sure, motorsports I think will be around for a long time, and possibly even roads marked as 'recreational' where people can do all the driving they like.

One of the issues raised in the Ars article was safety - who's responsible if a self-driving car causes an accident? What happens if a self-drive is involved in a crash with a normal car?

It also mentioned how even though there are tons of crashes every day, the second a self-drive car is involved in an accident (not even necessarily causes it) the media will go hysterical.
From: milko11 May 2011 10:00
To: af (CAER) 71 of 80
I don't have figures no, but come on. For the same reason that it's obvious the media would go nuts at the first accident involving one.
From: cynicoid11 May 2011 15:22
To: af (CAER) 72 of 80
That's got me thinking - since most satnavs these days seem to come with 3G built in, I wonder if there'd be some way to have them automatically show a Street View image when approaching complex junctions?

My TomTom kinda does that already.
On certain motorway junctions (the tricky ones I guess) it displays an image of the junction with guidance arrows showing which lane to be in. Works well and is very handy when you hear 'at the next junction keep in the middle lane then turn right' !? When it's a four lane multiple junction.

There's also an option to 'show images' which I'm not sure what it does as enabling/disabling doesnt' make any difference, but I guess it will show an image of a landmark or suchlike as you get close to it. Doesn't work round here but maybe in a major city ?
From: af (CAER)11 May 2011 15:42
To: cynicoid 73 of 80
Yeah I've seen pictures of the motorway thing, seems pretty handy especially when like you say there are 4 lanes or whatever.

I was thinking of something more for urban areas though, with traffic lights and that, although as Pete says, a map view might be more helpful there, unless some kind of virtual scene could be constructed akin to the motorway one. (are they generated automatically, or are they pre-rendered?)
From: Ixion12 May 2011 08:21
To: af (CAER) 74 of 80
I think someone should do a system using augmented reality where it uses a HUD on your windscreen and overlays an arrow on the junction it wants you to turn off on, now that would be cool!
From: DrBoff (BOFF)12 May 2011 09:02
To: ANT_THOMAS 75 of 80
What about it?
From: ANT_THOMAS12 May 2011 09:22
To: DrBoff (BOFF) 76 of 80
What do I enjoy about it?
From: DrBoff (BOFF)12 May 2011 09:35
To: ANT_THOMAS 77 of 80
Yes.
From: ANT_THOMAS12 May 2011 10:59
To: DrBoff (BOFF) 78 of 80
I get enjoyment from the actual driving, the changing gears, acceleration etc. I particularly enjoy challenging roads to drive on. I also like speed.