1–10…21–3031–4041–5051–6061–65

This is BS

From: fixrman 6 May 2011 04:31
To: JonCooper 49 of 65
38437.49 In reply to 38437.48
Good for you. A 4-banger, no doubt?
Reply
0/0
From: PNCOOL 7 May 2011 22:22
To: koswix 50 of 65
38437.50 In reply to 38437.24
Ah, I didn't know that. Not particularly a fast car (although it is quick for what it is), but all EU cars are made to run on 95 RON fuel. Anything lower than that and most cars would run pretty lumpy I would have thought, with them pre-detonating the fuel/air mix.
Reply
0/0
From: PNCOOL 7 May 2011 22:23
To: Dan (HERMAND) 51 of 65
38437.51 In reply to 38437.25
Indeed, but I wouldn't run 91 RON fuel.
Reply
0/0
From: PNCOOL 7 May 2011 22:26
To: ANT_THOMAS 52 of 65
38437.52 In reply to 38437.32
Just to confuse the issue, diesel isn't usually graded by RON but by cetane instead.
Reply
0/0
From: Dan (HERMAND) 8 May 2011 00:32
To: PNCOOL 53 of 65
38437.53 In reply to 38437.51
I would if it was 2004 prices.
Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper 8 May 2011 14:19
To: ALL54 of 65
38437.54
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13326275
Reply
0/0
From: Dan (HERMAND) 9 May 2011 09:55
To: JonCooper 55 of 65
38437.55 In reply to 38437.54
Let's face it - its like a heroine addict protesting to their dealer...
Reply
0/0
From: af (CAER) 9 May 2011 11:07
To: JonCooper 56 of 65
38437.56 In reply to 38437.48
Don't forget American gallons are bigger than the ones we use, so their MPG numbers are lower for the same amount of fuel.
Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 9 May 2011 11:09
To: af (CAER) 57 of 65
38437.57 In reply to 38437.56
God I love Imperial.
Reply
0/0
From: Manthorp 9 May 2011 12:00
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 58 of 65
38437.58 In reply to 38437.57
Imperialist.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix 9 May 2011 12:03
To: af (CAER) 59 of 65
38437.59 In reply to 38437.56
thought they were smaller?
EDITED: 9 May 2011 12:04 by KOSWIX
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 9 May 2011 12:13
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 60 of 65
38437.60 In reply to 38437.57
(fail)
Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 9 May 2011 12:16
To: Manthorp 61 of 65
38437.61 In reply to 38437.58
God Bless the Emporeresses.
Reply
0/0
From: af (CAER) 9 May 2011 12:22
To: koswix 62 of 65
38437.62 In reply to 38437.59
They might well be :$
EDITED: 9 May 2011 12:22 by CAER
Reply
0/0
From: Iain (WIBBLEBOY) 9 May 2011 21:02
To: Matt 63 of 65
38437.63 In reply to 38437.20
quote: Matt
We should all get Mr Fusions installed on our cars. We should all own and drive DeLoreans, too.

Or maybe not.


Ah, but the Mr Fusion only powers the time circuits and flux capacitor, the internal combustion engine still ran on conventional gasoline. Unless, of course, you were referring to us all popping back to the 80s for each fill up.

Sorry, far too late to this thread, but the movie nerd in me couldn't leave it unsaid. :)
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 9 May 2011 22:20
To: Iain (WIBBLEBOY) 64 of 65
38437.64 In reply to 38437.63
So all we need to do to get you to post more is to riddle our messages with inaccurate movie references?

WTF?!? Why is the stupid red underline saying "movie" is not a word? Or WTF for that matter. Stupid browser. :@
Reply
0/0
From: koswix 9 May 2011 23:26
To: Iain (WIBBLEBOY) 65 of 65
38437.65 In reply to 38437.63

>>Unless, of course, you were referring to us all popping back to the 80s for each fill up.

 


Maybe in the FUTURE that's exactly what we all /are/ doing, hence the shitty prices now :D

Reply
0/0