This is BS

From: ANT_THOMAS 4 May 2011 21:54
To: Dan (HERMAND) 32 of 65
So to sum things up I shouldn't put high RON petrol in my diesel car (giggle)
From: Dan (HERMAND) 4 May 2011 21:57
To: ANT_THOMAS 33 of 65
Well, I wasn't addressing you personally, but no, I wouldn't.
From: ANT_THOMAS 4 May 2011 22:10
To: Dan (HERMAND) 34 of 65
Since you know about these things. Should there be a noticeable difference in using higher RON fuel in a pretty standard 50cc moped?
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 4 May 2011 23:36
To: ALL35 of 65
If the weather would ever get nice I'd get my girl out and not cry so much about gas prices!
Attachments:
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 5 May 2011 00:09
To: JonCooper 36 of 65
:-(( :-(( :-((
From: koswix 5 May 2011 01:18
To: Dan (HERMAND) 37 of 65
There is knowledge that you know, and there is knowledge that you know where to look to find.
From: koswix 5 May 2011 01:19
To: ANT_THOMAS 38 of 65
Now I /know/ that's a bad idea.
From: fixrman 5 May 2011 03:41
To: koswix 39 of 65

Hey, wait a minute! I drive a Land Rover(at least part time)! It is a 1989 and I wouldn't say that it is a paragon of British fuel economy...

 

Wish we had Tdi 5s here.

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 5 May 2011 03:54
To: fixrman 40 of 65
Uh... it's twenty years old?

No car from 1989 is going to be great on fuel economy, whatever country it was made in.

Especially not a Land Rover - which was designed to rove land, not to save fuel!
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 5 May 2011 06:18
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 41 of 65
quote:
Especially not a Land Rover - which was designed to rove land


They should use that in their advertising. "Got land to rove? Buy a landrover!".
From: Dan (HERMAND) 5 May 2011 06:45
To: ANT_THOMAS 42 of 65
Not that I've ever heard of. You'd hear it if it needed it for some reason.
From: ANT_THOMAS 5 May 2011 07:48
To: Dan (HERMAND) 43 of 65
Fair enough. Using higher RON fuel always resulted in an extra 5 mph on the top speed!
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 5 May 2011 11:20
To: koswix 44 of 65
Donald Rumsfeld?
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 5 May 2011 11:39
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 45 of 65
I was going to use it as my signature. I laughed my ass off when Peter posted that!
From: fixrman 5 May 2011 11:48
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 46 of 65
I don't know about no car. I had a car from 1987, namely a Ford Escort, that was incredible good on fuel. 40MPG on a trip was not uncommon and at least 30 MPG local driving was the norm.

A large SUV is of course quite lousy on fuel, but fully loaded with family, luggage and a rack with 4 bikes is an impossible task for the Escort. Plus if there is a creek to be crossed, the Escort would have to float it.
From: koswix 5 May 2011 12:46
To: fixrman 47 of 65
And?
From: JonCooper 5 May 2011 18:23
To: fixrman 48 of 65
you get shit mpg, I get 38+ round town in my landrover
From: fixrman 6 May 2011 04:31
To: JonCooper 49 of 65
Good for you. A 4-banger, no doubt?
From: PNCOOL 7 May 2011 22:22
To: koswix 50 of 65
Ah, I didn't know that. Not particularly a fast car (although it is quick for what it is), but all EU cars are made to run on 95 RON fuel. Anything lower than that and most cars would run pretty lumpy I would have thought, with them pre-detonating the fuel/air mix.
From: PNCOOL 7 May 2011 22:23
To: Dan (HERMAND) 51 of 65
Indeed, but I wouldn't run 91 RON fuel.