1–10…41–5051–6061–7071–80…151–157

Sony Bastards

From: Kriv30 Apr 2011 03:45
To: Manthorp 66 of 157
38415.66 In reply to 38415.64

I know, I know. Who would have thought shredding anything which would identify me personally prior to throwing away was just not enough.

 

On a more serious note it's more the inconvenience, not being able to access my cash, and knowing some scrotums have my details. Fair enough if I wasn't careful, but my methods have not failed me since having a bank account.... very suspicious.

Reply
0/0
From: koswix30 Apr 2011 08:53
To: Kriv 67 of 157
38415.67 In reply to 38415.65
I'd used the wrong card, it'd expired :$ :$ :$
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS30 Apr 2011 08:56
To: koswix 68 of 157
38415.68 In reply to 38415.67
Hahahahahahahahahaha
Reply
0/0
From: koswix30 Apr 2011 09:54
To: ANT_THOMAS 69 of 157
38415.69 In reply to 38415.68
Shutup :$
Reply
0/0
From: Ixion30 Apr 2011 19:54
To: koswix 70 of 157
38415.70 In reply to 38415.69

Smile (co-op) say they are keeping track of cards registered on PSN but currently don't believe enough information was hacked to put accounts at risk and so are not cancelling any cards at the present time.

Reply
0/0
From: Mouse 1 May 2011 10:40
To: ALL71 of 157
38415.71
Oh dear
Report from PSX-Scene suggest that the unknown hackers even offered to sell the details back to Sony themselves with little luck before offering them up on underground credit card trading forums.

The really disturbing part of this is the news that these details actually include the CCV security code that until now was believed to be safe. With that code married to the card owner’s name as well as the rest of the card details then the card could be used without a hiccup


I would definitely be cancelling cards if I was on the Play Station Network.
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS 1 May 2011 10:56
To: Mouse 72 of 157
38415.72 In reply to 38415.71
If that's true then Sony need to officially notify everyone and stop lying!
Reply
0/0
From: koswix 1 May 2011 12:08
To: Ixion 73 of 157
38415.73 In reply to 38415.70
Yeah, I got that message when I logged in yesterday.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 1 May 2011 13:26
To: Mouse 74 of 157
38415.74 In reply to 38415.71
quote:
these details actually include the CCV security code that until now was believed to be safe

What do they mean "believed to be safe"!?

Storing the CV2 code is simply not allowed - not even encrypted.

:/
Reply
0/0
From: Mouse 1 May 2011 13:35
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 75 of 157
38415.75 In reply to 38415.74
Yuh? They are utter wallies then.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 1 May 2011 13:46
To: Mouse 76 of 157
38415.76 In reply to 38415.75
Utter wallies who wont have a leg to stand on in court.

Merchants who require the CVV2 for "card not present" transactions are forbidden by Visa from storing the CVV2 once the individual transaction is authorized and completed. This way, if a database of transactions is compromised, the CVV2 is not included, and the stolen card numbers are less useful. The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) also prohibits the storage of CSC (and other sensitive authorisation data) post transaction authorisation. This applies globally to anyone who stores, processes or transmits card holder data.

Supplying the CSC code in a transaction is intended to verify that the customer has the card in their possession. Knowledge of the code proves that the customer has seen the card, or has seen a record made by somebody who saw the card.
EDITED: 1 May 2011 13:52 by BOUGHTONP
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 1 May 2011 18:26
To: koswix 77 of 157
38415.77 In reply to 38415.76
This was posted on Reddit. Seems Sony had a conference about the issue? This is a good run down of what they discussed.

Link
Reply
0/0
From: Matt 1 May 2011 19:31
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 78 of 157
38415.78 In reply to 38415.77
That's good news. I think most PSN users can probably unclench their buttocks now.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 1 May 2011 20:43
To: Matt 79 of 157
38415.79 In reply to 38415.78
Yeah very good news. No one wants that shit to happen to anyone. It's getting to the point where you can't even play games now without worrying!
Reply
0/0
From: Mouse 1 May 2011 21:11
To: ALL80 of 157
38415.80
As far as I know, if anyone actually did get their card details used fraudulently because of Sony or any other reason they would (eventually) get that money back. The company that actually was on the receiving end of the fraudulent transaction however has no come back, they're the ones that would get fucked over.
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 1 May 2011 21:21
To: Mouse 81 of 157
38415.81 In reply to 38415.80
I have no idea if it's the same here as there, but if you use a Credit Card online the CC company usually works with you and returns your money. If, however, you use a Debit Card your bank doesn't have to do that and sometimes you are SOL. So, here at least, you should always use a CC when paying for stuff online.
Reply
0/0
From: Mouse 1 May 2011 22:46
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 82 of 157
38415.82 In reply to 38415.81
What is SOL?
Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 1 May 2011 23:17
To: Mouse 83 of 157
38415.83 In reply to 38415.82
Shit Out of Luck.
Reply
0/0
From: Mouse 1 May 2011 23:28
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 84 of 157
38415.84 In reply to 38415.83

I hate abbreviation.

 

I think it is similar here but even in debit cards you can tell your bank you didn't make that transaction and get what they call a Chargeback initiated. Unless it's Chip 'n's Pin.

Reply
0/0
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 1 May 2011 23:32
To: Mouse 85 of 157
38415.85 In reply to 38415.84

Sorry. Sol is standard around here!

 

A bank usually does that here but they don't have to.

Reply
0/0