Sony Bastards

From: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 6 May 2011 06:45
To: koswix 114 of 157
It's fine. For now.
From: Matt 6 May 2011 11:08
To: ALL115 of 157
An observer of the Internet Relay Chat channel used by the hackers told CNET today that a third major attack is planned this weekend against Sony's Web site. The people involved plan to publicize all or some of the information they are able to copy from Sony's servers, which could include customer names, credit card numbers, and addresses, according to the source. The hackers claim they currently have access to some of Sony's servers.


Oh dear.
From: Matt 6 May 2011 11:12
To: ALL116 of 157
And

In congressional testimony this morning, Dr. Gene Spafford of Purdue University said that Sony was using outdated software on its servers — and knew about it months in advance of the recent security breaches that allowed hackers to get private information from over 100 million user accounts.

According to Spafford, security experts monitoring open Internet forums learned months ago that Sony was using outdated versions of the Apache Web server software, which "was unpatched and had no firewall installed." The issue was "reported in an open forum monitored by Sony employees" two to three months prior to the recent security breaches, said Spafford.


To steal someone else's quote:

Playstation. It only does idiocy.
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 6 May 2011 11:45
To: Matt 117 of 157
I read that yesterday and couldn't believe it! They run a multi-million dollar network and can't keep it updated. I run a dumb little blog and check it daily for updates!
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 6 May 2011 15:13
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 118 of 157
While I kinda agree with you, I also see big problems with the amount of testing and so on needed when you roll something out to the kinds of servers that Sony runs. That's still no excuse though to not at least have their firewalls configured.
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 6 May 2011 15:20
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 119 of 157
Usually a network like that would have a test lab where they would test updates before rolling them out to live machines. It would only require a few physical machines or a virtual environment to do it.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 6 May 2011 15:25
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 120 of 157
I've done web work for Sony Music. They had staging servers to work on to ensure everything worked right before pushing it live. Only it never did, because the live servers had completely different configurations, versions of everything and security settings. I would imagine this sort of fuckwittedness infects the whole of Sony (and other big corps. Things were exactly the same on EMI, VMG and Warner).
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 6 May 2011 15:27
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 121 of 157
Wow! Yeah it wouldn't do much good to test something on a completely different machine! The dumb asses!
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 6 May 2011 15:40
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 122 of 157
When you say "staging servers to work on" ... well, you don't work on staging, you test on staging. Sounds more like shared development servers, which also implies a lack of proper version control?

How can a tech company the size of Sony be *so* bad and survive this long? :S
From: Matt 6 May 2011 15:47
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 123 of 157
Doesn't surprise me.

Reading more about the PSN debacle yesterday, and I came across an article (which I now can't find, of course) that revealed how developers could access the live PSN servers without any form of additional authentication beyond what was built into the PS3 dev-kits they bought from Sony.

This all sounds fine and dandy, using hardware as the authentication method. That is until some clever people work out that your random number generator you use for encryption isn't returning a random number at all and quickly realise how to put it to use to a) decrypt everything and b) turn a retail PS3 into a dev-kit.

Apparently this access included users account details including full names, addresses, etc. although not any payment details. I don't know if it's true, but from what you've said it certainly adds more weight to it being so.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 6 May 2011 15:51
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 124 of 157
<shrugs>

I called them what they called them.
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 7 May 2011 16:12
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 125 of 157

I know but.. Sony..
Last place I used to work for had a dev environment synched daily from live more or l less - they had about 70 employees, so not exactly a big company, but having a good test environment was crucial.

 

Sony, eh?

From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 7 May 2011 16:16
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 126 of 157
Yeah, Sony is so good they don't need no stinking tests right!?
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 7 May 2011 16:26
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 127 of 157

Everything they produce is almost a piece of God. Not.

 

Even Apple with their immeasurable arrogance test things pretty damn well (antenna fiasco aside), so Sony have no excuse.

From: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 7 May 2011 16:28
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 128 of 157
100% agree. There is no excuse for a lack of security. It's one thing to get hit with a zero day. Quite another to be lax!
From: Matt 7 May 2011 17:39
To: ALL129 of 157
The PSN "Welcome back package" is now 2 free games from a list of 5.

Also, look out for more information on the rest of our Welcome Back programme, including which free content you will be eligible for. We will be offering PSN users the opportunity to select two PS3 games from a list of five, as well as offering PSP users the opportunity to choose two games from a list of four. We will let you know exactly what games are available very soon.


They should have break-ins like this more often!
EDITED: 7 May 2011 17:41 by MATT
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 7 May 2011 20:59
To: Matt 130 of 157
Depends on the list though:
  1. Mong
  2. Mong Mong
  3. Mong III
  4. Mong IV
  5. Mong: Will It Never End?
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)15 May 2011 18:56
To: koswix 131 of 157
PSN is back up here. Is it up for you now? I have been reading about a lot of people trading in their consoles and games. Did you do that yet?
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)16 May 2011 09:02
To: Ken (SHIELDSIT) 132 of 157
If I can pick up a PS3 for £50, I'm getting one. Hehehe.
From: Mouse16 May 2011 09:08
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR) 133 of 157
Me too. And that probably won't hit Sony that hard financially. If they end up with a fresh set of customers who have bought traded in PS3s it might even be good for them.