Teh Mine

From: JonCooper27 Feb 2011 13:38
To: Matt 922 of 3934
me either - and the map thing says you're miles from the hole
From: koswix27 Feb 2011 14:22
To: Matt 923 of 3934

Blue screened :-/

 

Back up now.

From: Matt27 Feb 2011 14:25
To: koswix 924 of 3934
Yay!

But it looks like some of the map data has corrupted, we now have huge bits of terrain in the middle of the pool that weren't there an hour ago.

Oh well, time to get the TNT out again.
From: Matt27 Feb 2011 14:34
To: koswix 925 of 3934
Gone again :(
From: spinning_plates27 Feb 2011 14:57
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 926 of 3934
I used Firefox.
From: koswix27 Feb 2011 15:06
To: Matt 927 of 3934
It's been up solidly for days, and now I get two blue screens in a row :/
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)27 Feb 2011 16:01
To: spinning_plates 928 of 3934
Bah, just tried and it looks like they all get JARs screwed up.

Stupid browsers. :@
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)27 Feb 2011 16:06
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 929 of 3934
They don't. A jar is a zip archive.
From: Matt27 Feb 2011 16:16
To: koswix 930 of 3934
:(
EDITED: 4 Mar 2023 13:35 by MATT
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)27 Feb 2011 16:16
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 931 of 3934
It's an executable zip file.

A browser's default behaviour should be treating it as an executable, because people that know/care they are zip files (the minority) will know how to override that behaviour, whilst people that don't will get all confused.
From: JonCooper27 Feb 2011 16:18
To: Matt 932 of 3934
kos was off to watch rugby, he may not notice for a while
From: Matt27 Feb 2011 16:20
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 933 of 3934
* The browser should choose what to do based on what the server says the file is.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)27 Feb 2011 16:24
To: Matt 934 of 3934
Well, if there's different content types to specify that, then yeah.

(And, if it hasn't explicitly been set by the uploader, the default behaviour should again be to determine if its an executable JAR and act accordingly.)
From: JonCooper27 Feb 2011 16:28
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 935 of 3934
my browser (IE8) did detect it and act accordingly - maybe spinningplates has buggered about with some settings or installed some software that hijacked the .jar extension?
From: koswix27 Feb 2011 16:29
To: ALL936 of 3934
IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL :@
From: Matt27 Feb 2011 16:33
To: koswix 937 of 3934
Have you tried reseating the RAM?
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)27 Feb 2011 16:33
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 938 of 3934
That has a mime type?
From: JonCooper27 Feb 2011 16:35
To: koswix 939 of 3934
google says that means vista has a hardware issue :(
From: koswix27 Feb 2011 16:41
To: Matt 940 of 3934

I'm now getting a stop code on boot, : 0x0000007E.

 

As far as I can tell froma quick google that's something to do with a kernal mode driver? :|

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)27 Feb 2011 16:43
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 941 of 3934
I can't be bothered figured out what you're saying there; I'm hungry and have stuff to do.

The JAR provided was an executable one. Unless someone explicitly said "don't treat this as an executable" (which wasn't done because there's no functionality to do that on Beehive's attachment page) then it should have been detected as an executable and passed down the chain to the browser which should have said "this is an executable jar, run or save?"

And what it definitely shouldn't have done is tacked on a .zip extension, because it already has a valid extension, (and because it isn't a pure zip).

And now I'm going to go eat and not let myself get distracted so I can get stuff finished. :@