1–10…3041–30503051–30603061–30703071–3080…3931–3934

Teh Mine

From: JonCooper21 Aug 2011 22:47
To: ANT_THOMAS 3065 of 3934
38140.3065 In reply to 38140.3064
been saying 'connection timed out:connect' for me for ages now
others were able to get on intermittantly
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS21 Aug 2011 23:04
To: JonCooper 3066 of 3934
38140.3066 In reply to 38140.3065
Hmm, odd. Working for me, but that doesn't seem like too much of a surprise (even though I am connecting via mine.teh rather than the local IP).
Reply
0/0
From: y2rich21 Aug 2011 23:30
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 3067 of 3934
38140.3067 In reply to 38140.3063
The whole thing is all at sea level. Will try and get on there tomorrow and keep plopping down buckets of water until it stops...might take a while seeing how much I had to cut out to get it all to connect.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)21 Aug 2011 23:32
To: y2rich 3068 of 3934
38140.3068 In reply to 38140.3067
Do it right and it fixes itself.

I'd try and explain but I can't think now. :(

Do it diagonally.
Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper22 Aug 2011 09:46
To: ANT_THOMAS 3069 of 3934
38140.3069 In reply to 38140.3066
I still have no connection, but I can't see why, I tried to find a missing link ~

quote: DOS
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Jon>ping wakeupbomb.no-ip.org

Pinging wakeupbomb.no-ip.org [69.65.19.116] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 69.65.19.116: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=49
Reply from 69.65.19.116: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=49
Reply from 69.65.19.116: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=49
Reply from 69.65.19.116: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 69.65.19.116:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 127ms, Maximum = 129ms, Average = 128ms

C:\Users\Jon>tracert wakeupbomb.no-ip.org

Tracing route to wakeupbomb.no-ip.org [69.65.19.116]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 46 ms 42 ms 40 ms lo0-central1.ptn-ag01.plus.net [195.166.128.202]

3 39 ms 39 ms 40 ms gi2-6-111.ptn-gw01.plus.net [84.92.3.137]
4 39 ms 40 ms 38 ms po4.ptn-gw02.plus.net [212.159.1.139]
5 45 ms 63 ms 40 ms 195.66.226.167
6 129 ms 130 ms 130 ms ae12.er1.Chi2.Servernap.net [66.252.3.129]
7 129 ms 130 ms 129 ms te9-4.csr2.Chi3.Servernap.net [66.252.0.69]
8 129 ms 129 ms 129 ms te9-2.csr1.Chi3.Servernap.net [66.252.0.9]
9 129 ms 129 ms 129 ms nx-deleted-host-1.no-ip.com [69.65.19.116]

Trace complete.
Reply
0/0
From: Chris (CHRISSS)22 Aug 2011 09:52
To: JonCooper 3070 of 3934
38140.3070 In reply to 38140.3069
I tried this morning about 8am and everything seemed to be working fine.
Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper22 Aug 2011 09:54
To: Chris (CHRISSS) 3071 of 3934
38140.3071 In reply to 38140.3070
there is someone on now - 'jeesus' - I can connect to the live map, and the mini -site, both of which I think are on the same server, but not the game :((
EDITED: 22 Aug 2011 09:55 by JONCOOPER
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 10:12
To: JonCooper 3072 of 3934
38140.3072 In reply to 38140.3069
That's not my IP. Have you tried connecting using mine.tehforum.co.uk?
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 10:32
To: ALL3073 of 3934
38140.3073

Someone has really gone to town with my email address and password.

 

Changed all my no-ip IP addresses. CUNTS.

 

Or maybe not. I'm confused.

Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 10:33
To: ALL3074 of 3934
38140.3074

All of these...

 

wakeupbomb.no-ip.org
wakeupbomb.no-ip.info
athomas.no-ip.org
anthonythomas.no-ip.org

 

Should all point to the same place (according to my no-ip setup page) but they don't.

Reply
0/0
From: Mikee22 Aug 2011 10:33
To: ALL3075 of 3934
38140.3075

Does anyone have any tips for speeding up a server?

 

I bought a dedicated web server to have a little play with minecraft on - it's not huge, 2gb ram..etc..

 

having a few speed issues though, even when just two people are connected.

Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 10:34
To: ALL3076 of 3934
38140.3076
And now they do.
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 10:35
To: Mikee 3077 of 3934
38140.3077 In reply to 38140.3075

Is it a server that people/forums have recommended for hosting a Minecraft Server?

 

I'm guessing there's a lot more than RAM that is the issue, CPU speed/available CPU speed is important.

Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper22 Aug 2011 10:41
To: ANT_THOMAS 3078 of 3934
38140.3078 In reply to 38140.3072
\o/ yay \o/

mine.tehforum.co.uk - works fine :D
Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 10:43
To: JonCooper 3079 of 3934
38140.3079 In reply to 38140.3078

Yeah, you should always use that really.

 

That is constantly set to my IP whereas I have to update the no-ip address every month or so so it doesn't expire, I may have forgotten :$

Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper22 Aug 2011 11:04
To: ANT_THOMAS 3080 of 3934
38140.3080 In reply to 38140.3079
no worries, just glad it's back

did spend a while deleting crap that seems to have made a home in my PC - which is probably a good thing :)
Reply
0/0
From: Mikee22 Aug 2011 11:13
To: ANT_THOMAS 3081 of 3934
38140.3081 In reply to 38140.3077

Nay not a recommended one...

 

Hmmmm.

Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 11:31
To: Mikee 3082 of 3934
38140.3082 In reply to 38140.3081
CPU might not be upto the job then. I'm guessing web serving is far less intensive than Minecraft serving.
Reply
0/0
From: Mikee22 Aug 2011 11:40
To: ANT_THOMAS 3083 of 3934
38140.3083 In reply to 38140.3082

Aye seems to be the case. It's only got a tiny CPU

 

http://www.kimsufi.co.uk/

 

(first one)

 

The upgrade after that seems pretty nice, though. Might transfer my linodes across to one of those.

Reply
0/0
From: ANT_THOMAS22 Aug 2011 11:56
To: Mikee 3084 of 3934
38140.3084 In reply to 38140.3083
Teh Mine's server spec is listed in Post 1 (msg:38140.1) if you want to get an idea of the speed required for the performance we get. The CPU is never maxed, the only thing I could do with doing is upgrading the RAM.
Reply
0/0