1–1011

google keywords

From: graphitone27 Aug 2010 17:02
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 4 of 11
37671.4 In reply to 37671.3
Yes, but only if you can prove the need for it in a Ven diagram.
Reply
0/0
From: koswix27 Aug 2010 17:11
To: graphitone 5 of 11
37671.5 In reply to 37671.2
I'm on twice, too!
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)27 Aug 2010 17:14
To: koswix 6 of 11
37671.6 In reply to 37671.5
That says "Hugh", not "huge".


Oh wait... I forgot that's your nickname. :(
EDITED: 27 Aug 2010 17:16 by BOUGHTONP
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone27 Aug 2010 17:14
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 7 of 11
37671.7 In reply to 37671.6
(giggle)
Reply
0/0
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)27 Aug 2010 18:22
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 8 of 11
37671.8 In reply to 37671.1

Odd that 'thob' and 'bumming' are missing.

 

I think Google must be b0rked somehow.

Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)27 Aug 2010 19:02
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 9 of 11
37671.9 In reply to 37671.8
Well it is oddly selective in what it indexes (or rather, admits to indexing).

It's aware that we have over 30k pages, but it claims not to have indexed any in the sitemap - though it does return around 120-220 results if you search.

So something is definitely going on, but is something that'd take some digging to figure out.
Reply
0/0
From: Manthorp28 Aug 2010 00:59
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 10 of 11
37671.10 In reply to 37671.8
I get a name check at no. 7, anyway.
Reply
0/0
From: paul28 Aug 2010 17:24
To: Manthorp 11 of 11
37671.11 In reply to 37671.10
Nope, I think you'll find that is a reference to Rendle's nickname.

But you already knew that, didn't you?
Reply
0/0