Wowzers

From: Matt 7 Jul 2008 07:46
To: ALL1 of 22
47 Guests. That's a new record for users online at any one time, and there was me thinking we'd never beat the previous record.
From: Manthorp 7 Jul 2008 07:52
To: Matt 2 of 22
What drove that then? Any hints in the analytics? Can we flame them?
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD) 7 Jul 2008 08:14
To: Manthorp 3 of 22

More to the point, can we block their IP addresses so they can't do it again?

 

Then we'll track them down and post doggy doo-doo through their letter boxes.

 

That'll learn 'em :Y

Message 34632.4 was deleted
From: Manthorp 7 Jul 2008 18:14
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH) 5 of 22
Your fault then. Expect poopoo post.
From: Matt 7 Jul 2008 18:28
To: Manthorp 6 of 22
Looks like we got indexed by Ask.com's search bot which seems to run from approximately one metric fuck-tonne of IP addresses.

Now if only Google would start indexing out sitemap.
From: Manthorp 7 Jul 2008 18:42
To: Matt 7 of 22
Do web spiders drink tea and eat cake?
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 7 Jul 2008 18:54
To: Matt 8 of 22
Have you checked with Google Webmaster tools to ensure the sitemap is valid?
EDITED: 7 Jul 2008 19:02 by BOUGHTONP
From: Matt 7 Jul 2008 19:24
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 9 of 22
Yes. Submitted Mar 6, 2008, last downloaded 31 minutes ago (!!), but all it reports is:

quote:
No pages from your Sitemaps are currently in Google's index. Indexing can take time. You may find it helpful to review our information for webmasters and webmaster guidelines


There are pages indexed, but they're from the bot crawling the pages before we had the sitemap.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 7 Jul 2008 19:32
To: Matt 10 of 22
quote:
last downloaded 31 minutes ago (!!)

That was probably me - I tried submitting it to see what would happen.


Very odd that it's accepting it but not picking anything up. :/
Message 34632.11 was deleted
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 Jul 2008 07:10
To: Matt 12 of 22
Heh, there's 105 guests online right now.

By the logs maybe that's Yahoo! is spidering us?

And also...
quote:
Most users ever online was 287 on 3:44.


O_o


Is Ask.com identified in the guest->search engine thing?
From: Matt10 Jul 2008 08:18
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 13 of 22
Looks like we're actually getting indexed by a lot of search engines! Finally!

Beehive recognises these search engines:

Alexa,
Ask.com,
Baidu,
GameSpy,
Gigablast,
Google,
Google Images,
Inktomi,
MSN Search,
Altavista,
Yahoo!.
Message 34632.14 was deleted
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)10 Jul 2008 22:30
To: ALL15 of 22
Oooh, appears we are starting to get indexed properly now - Google has gone from ~1,600 to ~4,800 results...

(bounce)
From: Matt11 Jul 2008 21:21
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 16 of 22
Now 8,160 results. Quite a lot of duplicate results with the same threads appearing a number of times due to the 20 posts per page style navigation.

I wonder if it would be a good idea to make Beehive show all messages in a thread on a single page whenever it knows that the page is being viewed by a search engine bot.

Hmm.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)11 Jul 2008 21:32
To: Matt 17 of 22
Hmm, I'd say it's fine once it points to the appropriate page where the relevant result(s) are found.


What it should do is have navigational link tags.

i.e. plonk this in head:
HTML code:
<link rel="contents" href="lthread_list.php?webtag=DEFAULT"/>
<link rel="first"    href="lmessages.php?webtag=DEFAULT&msg=2226.1"/>
<link rel="previous" href="lmessages.php?webtag=DEFAULT&msg=2226.1921"/>
<link rel="next"     href="lmessages.php?webtag=DEFAULT&msg=2226.1961"/>
<link rel="last"     href="lmessages.php?webtag=DEFAULT&msg=2226.2331"/>
<link rel="up"       href="lthread_list.php?webtag=DEFAULT&folder=1"/>


(using msg:2226.1941 as an example; would actually be variable, obviously)
EDITED: 11 Jul 2008 21:34 by BOUGHTONP
From: Matt11 Jul 2008 22:32
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 18 of 22
Done. Lets see if that makes a difference.
From: Mouse11 Jul 2008 22:51
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 19 of 22
What's that do then?
Message 34632.20 was deleted