1–1011–2021–30…111–119

Teh Forum Awards 2007 - Award categories

From: Manthorp26 Jan 2007 00:28
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 13 of 119
31702.13 In reply to 31702.12
You are so asking for a slice of face-in-glue action.
Reply
0/0
From: Mike (QUIGABYTE)28 Jan 2007 03:53
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 14 of 119
31702.14 In reply to 31702.1
:{)
Reply
0/0
From: Manthorp31 Jan 2007 17:58
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 15 of 119
31702.15 In reply to 31702.1
WHY ARE WE WAITING, WHY-Y ARE WE WAITING..?
Reply
0/0
From: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ)31 Jan 2007 18:50
To: Manthorp 16 of 119
31702.16 In reply to 31702.15
Because I've been running around like a blue-arsed fly with work, and then whatever happened that messed up the thread-readness happened, and then I totally forgot.
Reply
0/0
From: Manthorp31 Jan 2007 19:07
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 17 of 119
31702.17 In reply to 31702.16
Give the job to Trig, I say.
Reply
0/0
From: Rich17 Mar 2007 19:43
To: Manthorp 18 of 119
31702.18 In reply to 31702.17
The 'Virgin Galactic' award for most obscure tangent in a thread?
Reply
0/0
From: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42)18 May 2007 03:04
To: Kenny J (WINGNUTKJ) 19 of 119
31702.19 In reply to 31702.1
I'd like a Best American award, which will undoubtedly go to Isa, but I at least want to qualify.
Reply
0/0
From: Manthorp18 May 2007 06:18
To: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42) 20 of 119
31702.20 In reply to 31702.19
Mind you, I'd nominate Lindy, just to piss her off.
Reply
0/0
From: Linn (INDYLS)18 May 2007 13:13
To: Manthorp 21 of 119
31702.21 In reply to 31702.20
:D

Dems fightin’ words!

Reply
0/0
From: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE)18 May 2007 13:39
To: Linn (INDYLS) 22 of 119
31702.22 In reply to 31702.21
Typical American response.
Reply
0/0
From: Linn (INDYLS)18 May 2007 23:49
To: THERE IS NO GOD BUT (RENDLE) 23 of 119
31702.23 In reply to 31702.22
As apposed to the typical British response?


"I say. By jove. That was rather unnecessary."
 
(giggle)




Reply
0/0
From: Dave!!19 May 2007 09:07
To: Linn (INDYLS) 24 of 119
31702.24 In reply to 31702.23
Naah, that's just a typical Rendle response...
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)19 May 2007 10:06
To: Linn (INDYLS) 25 of 119
31702.25 In reply to 31702.23
(nevermind)
EDITED: 19 May 2007 11:17 by BOUGHTONP
Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)19 May 2007 10:52
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 26 of 119
31702.26 In reply to 31702.25
(wrong)

quote:
ap·pose /əˈpoʊz/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-pohz] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object), -posed, -pos·ing.
1. to place side by side, as two things; place next to; juxtapose.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)19 May 2007 11:18
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 27 of 119
31702.27 In reply to 31702.26
:((

I knew that, but had completely forgotten about it. :'(
Reply
0/0
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)19 May 2007 11:26
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 28 of 119
31702.28 In reply to 31702.27
(hugleft)
Reply
0/0
From: Rowan19 May 2007 12:39
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 29 of 119
31702.29 In reply to 31702.26
Still, a bit of an odd usage, though. Opposed is far more usual. (Google agrees: opposed [49.4 million] vs apposed [0.29 million]).
Reply
0/0
Message 31702.30 was deleted
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)19 May 2007 13:29
To: Rowan 31 of 119
31702.31 In reply to 31702.29
The same applies to common vs. usual. Doesn't really say owt about validity.
Reply
0/0
From: Rowan19 May 2007 13:40
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N) 32 of 119
31702.32 In reply to 31702.31
I didn't say it was invalid, I said it was odd.
Reply
0/0