1–1011–20

CSS Layout Design

From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)19 Sep 2006 15:57
To: Bex (SIRBEX) 8 of 20
30672.8 In reply to 30672.7
SPAMMER! :@
Reply
0/0
From: Wayne (SCOREZ2000)20 Sep 2006 07:45
To: Bex (SIRBEX) 9 of 20
30672.9 In reply to 30672.5
Doesn't work :0(
Reply
0/0
From: Bex (SIRBEX)21 Sep 2006 07:10
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 10 of 20
30672.10 In reply to 30672.8

And I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you meddling...PBs!

 

Wayne: The site doesn't work? That's bizarre if so, as it works fine for me, so therefore should work for everyone :@

Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)21 Sep 2006 08:32
To: Bex (SIRBEX) 11 of 20
30672.11 In reply to 30672.10
It's working for me... although I've got a feeling the interface has changed; maybe it was down because of that?
Reply
0/0
From: Wayne (SCOREZ2000)21 Sep 2006 09:52
To: Bex (SIRBEX) 12 of 20
30672.12 In reply to 30672.5

Works now, and looks like exactly what I am after.
Cheers.

Reply
0/0
From: Bex (SIRBEX)21 Sep 2006 11:18
To: Wayne (SCOREZ2000) 13 of 20
30672.13 In reply to 30672.12
Yay! I did something useful (dance)
Reply
0/0
Message 30672.14 was deleted
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 4 Feb 2019 13:25
To: ALL15 of 20
30672.15
BLAST FROM THE PAST!  :-O~~~
Reply
0/0
From: milko 4 Feb 2019 15:56
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 16 of 20
30672.16 In reply to 30672.15
just another "here is a cut and paste from a wikihow style page, and then a link to their site". I wonder why they scrape such ancient posts to bump with this stuff? Anyway, boooooring, but always nice to see an old thread and remember people.
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 4 Feb 2019 17:19
To: Bex (SIRBEX) 17 of 20
30672.17 In reply to 30672.5
The link's down again. :C
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 4 Feb 2019 17:21
To: graphitone 18 of 20
30672.18 In reply to 30672.17
How many links from 2006 do you expect to still work?
Reply
0/0
From: graphitone 4 Feb 2019 17:48
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 19 of 20
30672.19 In reply to 30672.18
30.
Reply
0/0
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX) 4 Feb 2019 18:03
To: graphitone 20 of 20
30672.20 In reply to 30672.19
That was #31.
Reply
0/0