1–1011–15

Forum Update 14th May

From: Manthorp14 May 2006 23:15
To: Matt 2 of 15
29401.2 In reply to 29401.1
Thanks Matt. You're a good 'un.
Reply
0/0
From: Dave!!14 May 2006 23:16
To: Matt 3 of 15
29401.3 In reply to 29401.1

Yay! :D

 

Nice one Matt!

Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper15 May 2006 08:21
To: Matt 4 of 15
29401.4 In reply to 29401.1
just went to the test stuff here folder and tried to split a thread at post 30

and got this error

quote:
Unknown error [1146]

Table 'tehforumdb.DEFAULT_THREAD_TRACKED' doesn't exist

INSERT INTO DEFAULT_THREAD_TRACKED (TID, NEW_TID, CREATED, TRACK_TYPE) VALUES ('22853', '29404', NOW(), 1)


Unknown error in line 130 of file db_mysql.inc.php


also: I was expecting to be able to name the new thread (or did I miss that bit?)
EDITED: 15 May 2006 08:30 by JONCOOPER
Reply
0/0
From: milko15 May 2006 09:53
To: Matt 5 of 15
29401.5 In reply to 29401.1
quote: beeehive

Unknown error [8] Undefined index: MOVED_TID

Unknown error in line 661 of file messages.inc.php

on my new polls test thread in 'teh forum' folder.

It seems to have posted it but I can't look at it.
Reply
0/0
From: Matt15 May 2006 09:57
To: JonCooper 6 of 15
29401.6 In reply to 29401.4

That should be fixed now.

 

And no you can't name the thread yet. At the moment it uses the old thread name taken from the 1st post of the split or merged thread.

Reply
0/0
From: Matt15 May 2006 10:08
To: milko 7 of 15
29401.7 In reply to 29401.5
And that is fixed also.
Reply
0/0
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)15 May 2006 12:06
To: Matt 8 of 15
29401.8 In reply to 29401.1
I just created a new thread (msg:29409.1) but it won't mark as read.

(Created in light mode, viewed it in both light and regular)

Going into thread options and manually setting it to 1 of 1 worked though.
Reply
0/0
From: milko15 May 2006 12:34
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP) 9 of 15
29401.9 In reply to 29401.8
Getting the same problem with my two poll test threads as well.
Reply
0/0
Message 29401.10 was deleted
From: Matt15 May 2006 13:27
To: milko 11 of 15
29401.11 In reply to 29401.9

Working now?

 

At least there is no reason for it not to work.

Reply
0/0
From: milko15 May 2006 13:53
To: Matt 12 of 15
29401.12 In reply to 29401.11
Still showing as 6 new and 8 new respectively!
Reply
0/0
From: Matt15 May 2006 14:02
To: milko 13 of 15
29401.13 In reply to 29401.12

And now?

 

(You'll have to click on the threads again to mark them as read.)

Reply
0/0
From: milko15 May 2006 14:34
To: Matt 14 of 15
29401.14 In reply to 29401.13
Yay they've gone this time. Good work, stout fellow, cup of tea.
Reply
0/0
From: JonCooper15 May 2006 16:05
To: Matt 15 of 15
29401.15 In reply to 29401.6
that's fixed very well - it took out the post secified and all related posts, leaving the original thread intact and creating a new one for the off topic post and it's replies, oh and left links to where all the moved posts had gone

all exactly as you expected I have no doubt, but very impressive
Reply
0/0