Cracked my ball

From: Darren17 Nov 2003 16:37
To: Manthorp 1251 of 2579

Ooooh, rough bumming and a dragonsicle.

 

Noice!!!

From: Manthorp17 Nov 2003 18:41
To: Darren 1252 of 2579
<maidenly blush> (or even bush, as I first typed)
From: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42) 2 Dec 2003 22:48
To: ALL1253 of 2579
*brings thread back to life*
From: ANT_THOMAS 2 Dec 2003 22:48
To: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42) 1254 of 2579
Bitch
From: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42) 2 Dec 2003 22:50
To: ANT_THOMAS 1255 of 2579
You know it.
From: Manthorp 2 Dec 2003 23:30
To: AND HIS PROPHET IS (MOHAMED42) 1256 of 2579
Bah! Will you never let me forget my shame?
Message 2226.1257 was deleted
From: truffy 3 Dec 2003 09:30
To: Manthorp 1258 of 2579
to be fair, it was pretty shameful shame.
From: Manthorp 3 Dec 2003 09:34
To: Mr (M00RL0CK) 1259 of 2579
You can't capture the way I tell 'em through the written word alone.
From: Manthorp 3 Dec 2003 09:35
To: truffy 1260 of 2579
But 1260 reminders?
From: truffy 3 Dec 2003 09:45
To: Manthorp 1261 of 2579

that way you won't do it again.

 

or, if you do, you won't admit it here :D

From: dyl 4 Dec 2003 02:03
To: Manthorp 1262 of 2579
Remind me of the scale of those things.
From: Mouse 4 Dec 2003 02:09
To: dyl 1263 of 2579

I would guesstimate they are about 4.5cm in diameter absolutely intricate, possibly down to the micrometre. They fit snuggly together together in a very satisfying and clinky way also and I vastly approve of them.

 

I have never written a paragraph that long before about a man's balls.

From: Manthorp 4 Dec 2003 08:20
To: dyl 1264 of 2579

Aye, the ^Mouseling^ is about right. 4.5-5cm external diameter. I'm trying to finish no. 7 for Christmas - the first in which one scene runs across both halves. Masonic symbolism on this one.

 

<edit>ps. Ta for the kind words. Mouse.

EDITED: 4 Dec 2003 09:21 by MANTHORP
From: JonCooper 4 Dec 2003 09:18
To: Manthorp 1265 of 2579

5cm? wtf is that? are we talking about something about 2 inches??

 

[too old to think in 'foriegn']

Message 2226.1266 was deleted
From: JonCooper 4 Dec 2003 09:51
To: Mr (M00RL0CK) 1267 of 2579

I did actually know that, hence me getting the right answer on the first try

 

I continue my objection to the foriegn measurment system though

Message 2226.1268 was deleted
From: JonCooper 4 Dec 2003 19:54
To: Mr (M00RL0CK) 1269 of 2579
if we went about doing stuff just because it's 'sensible' then we'd all be speaking esperanto.
Message 2226.1270 was deleted