Exxxxxactly.
Any attempt to make it even slightly more difficult to vote is voter suppression. Usually has the biggest impact on people in a lower socio-economic position, which is generally the intention. Then throw in a bit of gerrymandering for good measure.
I can understand your idea. Let's take some actual examples and see where it leads us:
1) Voter laws
- Perhaps this is understood, but just for clarity, the voting laws are written on a "state by state" basis.
- There is not "one voting law" for the country that applies to everyone equally and it varies considerably across the country
- You can reasonably ask "why", because we do as well, but it is because of the original discussions about "states rights" vs "Federal rights" way back in the 1700s and the framing of the constitution.
- As a result of this, we have various state governments in constant lawsuits with the Federal government (both directions), which is expensive, wasteful, and silly, but still better than the 1800s approach of having a civil war over similar issues. We consider this to be "progress".
2) Vote Implementation
- The method of determining where polls are placed is county by county (slightly larger than a city).
- The person responsible for running the election in each state is either appointed (by the party running the state) or occasionally by election. This has a huge impact on vote count and has determined who is president in the past.
- The hours and days that polls are open varies state by state
- The paper and electronic methods used to vote vary state by state, and to some extent, county by county
- There is no actual "requirement" that ballots sent in by mail are ever opened and counted. I learned this the hard way during the Gore / Bush election, and that nearly 20 years of faithfully mailing in my ballots - were most likely never opened. I traveled a lot on business, so voting my mail made a lot of sense, at least I imagined it did.
- Ever since the Bush / Gore election, there has been some movement to standardize the ballot method, counting, and push to ensure that mail in votes are counted.
- There has also been movement to open up the "election day" to more days than just election Tuesday, for example, the Sunday and Monday as well.
- While the individual states still make the decision on what is done, there are some systems that are tested at the Federal / National level and considered certified. The Federal government provides funding to states to implement these systems if they choose to, and most of them have chosen one of these certified voting systems.
The states can still choose to do something else, but if / when it gets hacked or causes problems, it would be a political nightmare for that state's political leaders.
EDITED: 19 May 2017 05:59 by HARRYN