Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–20
21–24
Odd connection issue
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
14 Feb 2017 10:12
To: graphitone
10 of 24
41884.10
In reply to
41884.9
They have lego.
From: koswix
14 Feb 2017 10:22
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
11 of 24
41884.11
In reply to
41884.10
*megablox
From: Serg (NUKKLEAR)
14 Feb 2017 12:08
To: koswix
12 of 24
41884.12
In reply to
41884.11
*
Lepin Death Star
actually. Shh, don't tell them about the thermal exhaust port!
EDITED: 14 Feb 2017 12:09 by NUKKLEAR
From: koswix
14 Feb 2017 13:07
To: Serg (NUKKLEAR)
13 of 24
41884.13
In reply to
41884.12
Classy.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
14 Feb 2017 14:54
To: ANT_THOMAS
14 of 24
41884.14
In reply to
41884.1
OpenVPN can choke weaker machines/connections with the encryption. It adds a fair overhead to everything. Assuming you're using the VPN to bypass bullshit laws rather than for privacy, you could turn encryption off (cipher none) and ideally use PPTP rather than UDP or other.
From: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
14 Feb 2017 15:27
To: koswix
15 of 24
41884.15
In reply to
41884.11
Damn. How
did
I miss this hive of international failed terrorist states right under my nose?
Attachments:
megabloks.jpg
From: ANT_THOMAS
14 Feb 2017 19:14
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
16 of 24
41884.16
In reply to
41884.14
Looks like it was some sort of DDoS protection kicking in. But that's a good tip anyway. I've seen very slow SCP transfers in the past on weak CPUs, where changing the cipher sped things up massively.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
14 Feb 2017 19:26
To: ANT_THOMAS
17 of 24
41884.17
In reply to
41884.16
Yeah, I use SSHFS for letting things see the storage of other things and disabled the encryption as much as possible cos why not on an internal network.
(Tried NFS but found it surprisingly flaky and *way* more complex to set up).
From: ANT_THOMAS
14 Feb 2017 19:34
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
18 of 24
41884.18
In reply to
41884.17
Yeah definitely fine on an internal network.
Only played with NFS for one share after SMB was being odd. Always read about using NFS rather than SMB in all scenarios since it's supposed to be much quicker.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
14 Feb 2017 20:40
To: ANT_THOMAS
19 of 24
41884.19
In reply to
41884.18
Should definitely be better than Samba, yeah. And I liked it apart from it just flaking out every couple of days. Probably my fault but I couldn't be arsed spending much time sorting it out since I don't need 99% of its features - I just want super-easy access to files across the network and sshfs is kinda perfect for that.