> You can't simply cut out bits of my post and claim it's waffle
I think you'll find I can - see msg:41579.25 for an example.
> Also, ...[waffle]... to negate it entirely is foolish.
It seems I mis-judged when reducing; my original wording made it impossible to claim inferrance of that nonsense. Oh well.
Keeping abreast of the available options is a relatively simple task that all competent professionals do, and an entirely separate step from deciding whether any alternative should be even considered, nevermind actually testing it out and scheduling when a live implementation is viable and sensible.