Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
11–19
Internet Explorer - him gone
From: graphitone
18 Mar 2015 21:38
To: CHYRON (DSMITHHFX)
6 of 19
41440.6
In reply to
41440.5
(nod)
You ever looked at the code that it spews out? It's horrible.
From: cynicoid
19 Mar 2015 19:49
To: ALL
7 of 19
41440.7
What I hate about IE is there are dozens of security/configuration options, 90% of which I have no idea what they mean or do.
Open up firefox and what are there, 20 ? Just about all are understandable and simple.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
19 Mar 2015 21:50
To: cynicoid
8 of 19
41440.8
In reply to
41440.7
The biggest problems with IE are ActiveX and the intimate connection between the browser and the OS.
I read somewhere, long ago, that the difference between Java(?, may have been something else) and ActiveX is that while both of them open the door of your computer to strangers, Java/whatever follows them around the house making sure they don't get up to no good, while ActiveX just stands at the door waiting for them to leave.
Having said that Java hasn't been faring too well recently in terms of security.
From: koswix
20 Mar 2015 00:24
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
9 of 19
41440.9
In reply to
41440.8
Yeah but at least it's free, unlike safari.
EDITED: 20 Mar 2015 00:25 by KOSWIX
From: Dave!!
21 Mar 2015 13:44
To: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
10 of 19
41440.10
In reply to
41440.8
If I had to say one positive thing about ActiveX over Java, it is that at least you don't end up with all the compatibility issues with ActiveX.
At our place we have some applets that require a version of Java 6, they'll work with Java 7 but only if the security settings are changed. Then a different site comes along and requires Java 7 or early Java 8, then Java says "I need updating" and people do that and it breaks both sites as the later Java 8s require signed apps. And if they uninstall it then it goes back to Java 6 which breaks the second site.
I detest Java
:(
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
21 Mar 2015 14:00
To: Dave!!
11 of 19
41440.11
In reply to
41440.10
>you don't end up with all the compatibility issues with ActiveX
Well it only works in IE and on Windows so...
At least Java fails to work on every platform in the universe.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
21 Mar 2015 18:09
To: Dave!!
12 of 19
41440.12
In reply to
41440.10
> we have some applets
There's your problem.
EDITED: 21 Mar 2015 18:10 by BOUGHTONP
Message 41440.13 was deleted
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
21 Mar 2015 21:43
To: Al JunioR (53NORTH)
14 of 19
41440.14
In reply to
41440.13
I'm out of nothing, though I could do with some more.
From: 99% of gargoyles look like (MR_BASTARD)
21 Mar 2015 22:01
To: Dave!!
15 of 19
41440.15
In reply to
41440.10
Don't in any way get the idea that I like Java. I don't. And, as I think I've mentioned here before, I have to use an International regulatory database using Java that suffers from
exactly
the version incompatibilities that you mention.
Java is a right royal PITA.
But, also what Xen sed.