Well, in all actuality - around these parts anyway - you just don't know who might have a gun on them. That acts as a deterrent. Do you think those guys would have accomplished what they did to that poor soldier had he been carrying a 9mm or a 45 on him? Of course they certainly might have still killed him because even people who carry guns get killed, jumped and can't defend themselves, stuff like that. But I think in most cases you would have a better chance with a gun than without.
I agree, sorta, about the assault weapons. It's so ingrained in us that we think we have the right to own any type of gun. I have friends who do shoot those types of things just for fun, so I can't say they have no purpose other than to kill, but that's their main purpose. I also have friends who own 50 cal. What is the purpose of a gun like that? Shooting a tank? Fucking crazy gun! But we are allowed to buy them so we do (not me, us in general).
I think if you stop and think about it, unless you're being silly, you can see the difference between an automatic weapon and a mortar or bomb or missile.
Yeah I don't know why I even thought about it. When I heard it on the radio I just thought about how horrible it would be to die that way.
If that deterrent thing is true, why are there so many murders in the USA? Psk, this thread won't work.
Agreed on that! I kinda hope he was dead just from the start where they apparently ran him over with their car.
Fucking weird in all ways - crowds of people stood around in the aftermath while the two waited for the police to show up, just milling about. And that incredibly brave woman talking to them... whole thing is just surreal really.
It's not a good neighbourhood, Woolwich.
There are a lot of murders all around the world. People kill people, that's the point. People were being stoned to death or racked long before guns.
Sorry, it was just something I was thinking about. I didn't start it to piss anyone off.
People are fucking insane. I just wish we could get along. How hard is it to live and let live? The idea of having to kill someone because they have different ideas than you is something I will never be able to understand.
I think part of the problem may well be that there's too many of us.
If we thinned out the population a bit then there'd less people around who'd want to do any killing. Also people would be more spread out. It's hard to kill anyone when you're 5 miles away from them. Unless you own mortars.
Seriously though, it's a hideous thing to take the life of another person, and responding by wanting to maim, torture and kill those responsible is equally reprehensible. Foregoing a debate on the death penalty or capital punishment, you can't just take a life for a life. S'a vicious circle innit?
Yup. I used to be in favor of the death penalty, but we've made so many mistakes, ie, killing innocent people and finding out after the fact, that I can't support it anymore.
The bottom line is that to be in favour of it, you've got to say it's ok to take a human life. Don't think I could ever sign up to something like that.
There are times when I think I could, and could actually probably do it. But I know I'd regret it. There are just people we'd be better off without. Someone who is nothing but evil and does nothing but harm others has no other purpose. Granted, they could change, but probably wouldn't. Those are the people I don't have a problem being killed.