Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
…
31–40
41–50
51–60
61–65
This is BS
From: PNCOOL
7 May 2011 22:23
To: Monsoir (PILOTDAN)
51 of 65
38437.51
In reply to
38437.25
Indeed, but I wouldn't run 91 RON fuel.
From: PNCOOL
7 May 2011 22:26
To: ANT_THOMAS
52 of 65
38437.52
In reply to
38437.32
Just to confuse the issue, diesel isn't usually graded by RON but by cetane instead.
From: Monsoir (PILOTDAN)
8 May 2011 00:32
To: PNCOOL
53 of 65
38437.53
In reply to
38437.51
I would if it was 2004 prices.
From: JonCooper
8 May 2011 14:19
To: ALL
54 of 65
38437.54
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13326275
From: Monsoir (PILOTDAN)
9 May 2011 09:55
To: JonCooper
55 of 65
38437.55
In reply to
38437.54
Let's face it - its like a heroine addict protesting to their dealer...
From: af (CAER)
9 May 2011 11:07
To: JonCooper
56 of 65
38437.56
In reply to
38437.48
Don't forget American gallons are bigger than the ones we use, so their MPG numbers are lower for the same amount of fuel.
From: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
9 May 2011 11:09
To: af (CAER)
57 of 65
38437.57
In reply to
38437.56
God I love Imperial.
From: Manthorp
9 May 2011 12:00
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
58 of 65
38437.58
In reply to
38437.57
Imperialist.
From: koswix
9 May 2011 12:03
To: af (CAER)
59 of 65
38437.59
In reply to
38437.56
thought they were smaller?
EDITED: 9 May 2011 12:04 by KOSWIX
From: Ken (SHIELDSIT)
9 May 2011 12:13
To: Drew (X3N0PH0N)
60 of 65
38437.60
In reply to
38437.57
(fail)