Reply to All
Show messages
Messages
Inbox
Search
Login
1–10
…
941–950
951–960
961–970
971–980
…
3931–3934
Teh Mine
From: Matt
28 Feb 2011 22:49
To: koswix
966 of 3934
38140.966
In reply to
38140.964
Nah, it's shit.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
28 Feb 2011 22:53
To: Matt
967 of 3934
38140.967
In reply to
38140.965
Hmm... is it individual blocks or big sections?
If it's just one or two blocks, I'd be tempted to keep it as a feature - or maybe build a shark around it.
:)
Kos - have you seen anything that can export to Collada format?
From: Matt
28 Feb 2011 22:55
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
968 of 3934
38140.968
In reply to
38140.967
Couple of individual blocks at the moment.
The other question is, how are we going to fill it with water?
From: patch
28 Feb 2011 22:59
To: Matt
969 of 3934
38140.969
In reply to
38140.968
That's easy enough. You put a layer of dirt into the pool, one block below the level you want the water at. Fill that area above the dirt layer with water so that it's smooth, then dig the earth out from under it.
From: Matt
28 Feb 2011 23:01
To: patch
970 of 3934
38140.970
In reply to
38140.969
That no longer works with 1.3. Notch "fixed" it.
Edit: Thought you were referring to the bedrock removal "hack"
EDITED: 28 Feb 2011 23:02 by MATT
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
28 Feb 2011 23:11
To: patch
971 of 3934
38140.971
In reply to
38140.969
I think you could do it with half as much - a checkerboard shape with mud placed first, then water in the holes, then dig the mud and it'll get filled in?
From: patch
28 Feb 2011 23:23
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
972 of 3934
38140.972
In reply to
38140.971
Maybe. I haven't tried that way. But then, since you're going to have to put blocks in the blank spaces of the pattern anyway (so that the non-blank spaces have something to be placed against), it's probably just as quick to make the layer solid.
From: koswix
28 Feb 2011 23:24
To: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
973 of 3934
38140.973
In reply to
38140.967
What's a Collada format?
From: patch
28 Feb 2011 23:25
To: Matt
974 of 3934
38140.974
In reply to
38140.970
Just a thought: is it worth worrying about the random bedrock blocks? Unless Notch decides that scuba gear would be a good addition, no-one will be able to swim far enough down to see it without drowning.
From: Peter (BOUGHTONP)
28 Feb 2011 23:39
To: patch
975 of 3934
38140.975
In reply to
38140.972
Oh... bugger. Yes and no.
I did realise that problem and worked out another alternative but by the time I'd posted I'd forgotten again.
What you can probably actually do is stripes:
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
:)
(football)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
:)
(clock)
So yellow faces are solid, clocks are where water placed, footballs can be skipped
I'd have to test that, but I think it'd work as producing still water.
Also, if the solid blocks are wool, could we set fire to them and then have them automatically clear a whole row, or would the water put it out too quickly?