OMG MUST YOU BE ANGRY WITH EVERYTHING?
I don't think being baffled by the word "visible" being used in a language built deliberately with short informal terms is finding a fault - it's pointing out a blatantly obvious one.
And for proof that it's not just me:
I know it’s part of the original example, but “VISIBLE†doesn’t scream LOLCODE at me. How about something like "<destination> SEEZ <expression>[!]" where <destination> is the output stream
quote: Reverend Loki
I also am not enamored with this use of the VISIBLE keyword. ... Personally I’d like to see something based off of the “LET ME SHOW YOU MY <output>" for this. Yeah, too wordy, but it’s a start.
etc.